To be a bit fairer, the Outlook approach probably reflects the fact that, originally,īack in Office 95 for PCs, Outlook was an extension of an earlier client that worked only as intranet - something you used only with other people on your own Exchange server. The MacBU developers, being on a "minority" platform, know better, and are smarter in not implementing it. To think that everybody else in the world uses Outlook, which they don't. The fact that Outlook for Windows implements it is an indication that the Outlook developers, unlike the Entourage developers, seem ![]() ![]() It's a really feeble protocol, and good that Entourage/Outlook does not (pretend to) implement it. Therefore when you get the reply you may incorrectly believe that he read it when he hasn't. (Not only Entourage/Outlook - there are many, many other other email clients which don't reply.) Therefore, if you don't get a reply you may incorrectlyĢ) It doesn't tell you that the recipient read the message anyway, only that his email client received it. DNR are a useless feature which gives people false assurances, always a bad thing:ġ) It doesn't work when the receiving email client does not have an automatic service that sends a reply.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |